This Matters To You If You Live Near Or Drive on El Camino

 

Stanford/Arrillaga Development on El Camino Will Dump 6400+ More Cars Daily Onto El Camino in Menlo Park

Massive 4 building complex along El Camino, stretching 3 blocks from the Tesla dealership to Middle ave. 

  • 5 stories tall
  • 440,000+ sq feet - the size of 4 Walmarts!
  • Medical offices, general offices dominate.   A smaller portion of housing and retail. 

Mega Traffic - 23 Miles of Additional Cars

El Camino is already gridlocked most of the day.  6400 cars is the equivalent of 23 miles of cars.  Imagine 23 miles of additional cars jammed onto El Camino in Menlo Park.  

This development is in addition to the other developments on El Camino including, Stanford's proposed 5 story office and theater complex on El Camino in Palo Alto @University;  the multi-story housing complex going up next year on the West side of El Camino between Partridge Ave and College Ave; Proposed office developments by Sobrato and other landowners for 1300 El Camino and 1400 El Camino.  And the Stanford 1.5 million square foot medical complex in Redwood city.  

Stanford will likely build medical offices and relocate its Welch road medical offices here. Medical offices are one of the highest traffic developments - with 10 minute appointments means that one doctor can generate - 48 patient trips per day.   Stanford has a "trip cap" in Santa Clara County - they are not allowed to increase traffic there - so they are motivated to export their traffic here to Menlo Park.   These are trips that are unlikely to be mitigated because sick people aren't going to carpool, take the shuttle, or bike.   Plus, medical offices are open 7 - 7pm.  Their extended hours mean even more traffic.  

 

Increased Car Traffic Endangers Safety on Residential

Streets:

To avoid El Camino, on the west side, drivers will cut through the residential streets like Oak, Oakdell, Arbor, Santa Cruz, University, College, Middle, Patridge, Harvard and Cambridge.  

On the east side of EL Camino, there will be increased traffic to/from 101 via Willow, Ravenswood, and Middlefield.

Zero Public Benefit

  • Stanford has a $19.7 billion endowment and yet, as a nonprofit, pays no property taxes to Menlo Park.  Unless it leases out this property as investment income,  in which case, the lessees could pay taxes, the public services this development will use  - fire, police, sewage, water - will be subsidized by Menlo Park taxpayers. 
  • Stanford carefully calibrated the size of the development to be under the "public benefits" requirements and avoid having to contribute to a pedestrian/bike underpass of the Caltrain tracks for Menlo Park residents. 
  • Our schools are over-crowded and under-funded.  If new families move into this development, it will cause further overcrowding without any new funding to the city. 

El Camino Will Cut Menlo Park In Two Forever

  • A larger, expanded El Camino will split Menlo Park even further.   Those on the West side of El Camino will have more difficulty crossing El Camino to get to the gym, playing fields, library, Menlo Atherton highschool or civic center.  And residents on the East side of El Camino will be further prevented from crossing El Camino to go shopping downtown, get to Hillview school or to the Safeway shopping center.  

Worsens the Housing Deficit

Menlo Park is required by California Law to build equal parts of housing vs. job-creating offices.  Menlo Park's current unbalanced ratio is 1.9 jobs per unity of housing.   To reach a jobs-housing balance would be 1.5 jobs per unit of housing.  This development, assuming 100 sq feet per employee, will be an unbalanced ratio of 15 jobs per unit of housing.  Therefore this development significantly increase the necessity of putting more housing elsewhere in Menlo Park.  

Increase in Noise and Air Pollution

The size of the development is massive - it's the equivalent of 4 massive Home Depots side by side.  The train noise, which currently dissipates everywhere, will likely bounce back from the massive wall of buildings into the Linfield neighborhood.  

The air pollution from the increase in traffic will result in poorer health and quality of life for residents.   

What Can Menlo Park Do?

Specific Plans are dynamic documents, and are expected to be changed.   A Specific Plan “may be amended as often as deemed necessary by the legislative body.”   The OPR’s guide further illuminates this principle of flexibility: “Specific Plans themselves are dynamic documents and may be subject to change.  There are no assurances to residents and project proponents that the Plan will not be subject to future revisions.” 

What Can You Do?

1.  Sign the petition or Sign up for Updates

2.  Volunteer to be a block leader and spread the word - hand out flyers and tell your neighbors about this development

3.  Write to the Planning Commission: planning.commission@menlopark.org and the City Council city.council@menlopark.org

What is SaveMenlo?

We're a group of people who live here in Menlo Park.  Many of us have children who ride or walk to school.  Others are long-timers with kids grown up.  

We concerned about affect of development, especially traffic on El Camino and cut-through traffic for all the roads that lead to/from El Camino, and the safety of our kids on our streets.  

We believe in intelligent development for an environmentally and financially sustainable Menlo Park

What do Menlo Park Residents Want?

Stanford originally represented to City Council that they would use the land to build low-traffic senior housing.  We want them to remove the high-traffic medical offices and general offices.  

Contact:

SaveMenlo Spokesperson Perla Ni

Resident on Yale Road, Menlo Park

ni.perla@gmail.com

415-902-2659

or

Stefan Petry

Resident on Cambridge, Menlo Park

 

 

 

Do you like this page?

Showing 6 reactions


Dmitriy Kernasovskiy commented 2013-05-19 19:39:01 -0700
I’m not opposed to the development, but I do think we need a pedestrian/bike under or overpass near Caltrain. That’d also help the issue of “dividing the city.” Also, our congestion wouldn’t be as bad if we opened up all 3 lanes of El Camino for traffic…
Josh Wetzel commented 2013-05-18 15:50:22 -0700
Agree w/ Paul on this, we need denser, high commercial/residential/office space along the El Camino/train corridor otherwise we’ll all beholden to driving and it will do all the above. Otherwise the above is mostly fear mongering among folks who don’t want progress (or change or new tax revenue, etc). Stop keeping Menlo Park in the dark ages, let’s keep up with our neighbors (like Palo Alto & Los Altos that are doing great things to improve downtown experiences).
Paul Roquet commented 2013-05-18 11:43:35 -0700
There is one thing I don’t understand: wouldn’t more high-density housing and more high-density retail would help reduce the need to base everything around driving? I’m all for reducing the amount of traffic (El Camino is already unpleasant for pedestrians), but reducing traffic simply by ensuring there is nowhere people will want to drive to doesn’t seem like most productive approach. Why not push for a development that would encourage people (local people especially) to walk or take public transport to rather than drive?
Patti Frazier followed this page 2013-04-01 18:26:30 -0700
Carol Kiparsky commented 2013-03-17 11:37:20 -0700
I live in Palo Alto, and whether you realize it or not we are in the same boat. Arrillaga is pushing and shoving a monstrous project off on us by our downtown Caltrain station and adjacent park. I think we should be comparing notes and uniting to fight him in both towns! Developers know no borders. Why should residents?
Marla Stark commented 2012-11-26 10:56:07 -0800
Does anyone know the status of the permits in the Menlo Park Planning or Building Departments? Is the proposal open for public review and comment at this point? It is important to understand its details and the process going forward.